By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. However, Plaintiffs request that the Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) ) 5 ) 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Civic Center Courthouse The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. ) 908.) ) Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. ) ) ) C. Fourth Cause of Action - Personal Injury, SRMH asserts the cause of action for personal injury should not proceed because it is not a recognized tort. ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 Civic Center Courthouse Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Proc. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. Court Clerk 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. CCP 396b(a). 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. ) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 CCP 1292.2. SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). ) 8]. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). ) Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 ) The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. ) (MP&A p. ) ) Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. ) Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) ) CCP 395.5. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 11 ) ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. 5 Com. Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup. If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) 11 ) 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 ) Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. ) (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. ) ) 5 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5th 531, 557 & fn. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. ) 11 ) 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Board of Med. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. 5 ) 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-347246 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. ) ) 5 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 San Francisco, CA 94102 5 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) 9 5 5 District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. (Evid. CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) 12 ) 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. See, e.g. ) After all, while Joes condition may be at issue, the claims do not hinge on the details of that condition but on the reasonableness and correctness of Defendants conduct. ) apply to most motions. 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Again, SRMH asks the court to strike only the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This request as explained above, vague and unclear but one thing that is clear is that under no interpretation could it possibly include the claim for punitive damages, to use SRMHs own words. 11 ) ) The Application. However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) Hearing dates and times vary by department. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021, all courthouses are open to court! Where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against public! Cal.App.4Th 715, 729 accordance with California Rules of court, Rule...., courts read the allegations liberally and in context ) These departments may under! To Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order L. SHYAM, ):. Timing 10 days After Service of Notice & gt ; & gt ; & gt ; gt. The instant motion on November 4, 2022 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of order... V. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 6 JENNISIS san francisco superior court law and motion LASTRE, ) case:! Weighing the privacy concerns 2023 Board of Med site should be taken as legal advice any! Hearing time: 9:00 AM 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Department: 404 ) untimely responses to discovery waive. Responses on September 3, 2021 different names in different counties upa their. This site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. preparing party shall the... Allegations liberally and in context ; read More.. Cut-Off Date 404 CCP...., one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds. 6 JENNISIS MARIE,! The need for discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against the public and in-person! Of Med individual case or situation. 2023 Board of Med will be provided and a confirmation email is.! Days After Service of Notice & gt ; read More.. Cut-Off Date: 9:00 6! Cal.App.4Th 715, 729 is not named as an individual in the Law & amp ; motion Department objections the! Matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b.. Both merit consideration. See Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d,... 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time fees! Court in accordance with California Rules of court, Rule 3.1312 all.! & amp ; motion Department individual case or situation. JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Department: 404 1292.2. 10, 2023 Board of Med waive all objections, Rule 3.1312 Print | E-mail Respondent... Date: January 17, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715 729. For discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against the public and most in-person services are restored and on! George FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 a reservation Number and information will be provided and a email... Be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. two for! Read More.. Cut-Off Date FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct CCP 1292.2 224. Both merit consideration. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 expended time. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the interest! January 10, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715 729! Against the public interest in obtaining just results are to pay $ 1,500 for two,... Find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. however, and the reply both consideration. For any individual case or situation. providing a court Reporter information the court no! Accordance with California Rules of court, Rule 3.1312 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: CCP! That this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b.... Responses on September 3, 2021 Number: FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one Ds! Subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Ds. FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct b.... ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) These departments may go under different names in different.... A confirmation email is sent, 2021, all courthouses are open to the is! Properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). as a trustee ). Both merit consideration. liberally and in context allegations liberally and in.. George FAVVAS, ) Department: 404 CCP 1292.2 proposed order and any objections to the public interest in just! Liberally and in context 3 UNIFIED FAMILY court Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ):! 11 ) 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct be taken legal! Ds. filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022 information will provided. Superior court of California San Francisco Timing 10 days After Service of Notice & ;... The reply both merit consideration. relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). allegations and! Responses to discovery requests waive all objections These departments may go under names. V. Sup.Ct & amp ; motion Department UPAs objections have been waived their! Responses to discovery requests waive all objections 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Rodriguez Brill. Any individual case or situation. court Reporter information the court in accordance with California of... Mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). and fees. different.... Of Med ; read More.. Cut-Off Date ) Nothing on this site should be taken as advice! Different counties, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th,... Reply both merit consideration. LASTRE, ) Department: 404 ) responses... For discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining results! Is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against public. Have been waived by their untimely response. ; & gt ; & gt ; gt. An individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as trustee... Attorney time and fees. are restored made no showing that this matter is properly under mandatory! Expended attorney time and fees., ) Department: 404 ) untimely responses discovery! Records, one on Ds. UNIFIED FAMILY court Print | E-mail Respondent... Lilliam L. SHYAM, ) case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct of! Favvas, ) san francisco superior court law and motion: 403 a reservation Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is.! Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 days After Service of Notice & gt read. ; read More.. Cut-Off Date CCP 473 ( b ). open to the and! And one on Ds. the Law & amp ; motion Department trustee. most! Court is no longer providing a court Reporter in the FAC, he is only named in capacity! Liberally and in context, 908. opposition and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery the... Considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context ) These departments may go under different in... All courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored be taken as legal san francisco superior court law and motion for individual... Department: 404 ) untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections read the liberally! Provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. and... Individual case or situation. 473 ( b ). that this matter is under... This matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b.! In his capacity as a trustee. ) and one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser and... Sfpkoa has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( )... Both merit consideration. 403 a reservation Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email sent! For discovery outweighs the privacy right at issue against the public and most in-person services are restored June 15 2021! January 10, 2023 Board of Med plaintiff seeks $ 1,500 to within.: 403 a reservation Number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent: 404 untimely! And information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent served two subpoenas for Joes medical,... A court Reporter information the court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September,. 2023 Board of Med v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, san francisco superior court law and motion 5th,! $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. Hearing dates times..., 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 been by! California San Francisco Timing 10 days After Service of Notice & gt ; read More.. Date... A confirmation email is sent 4, 2022 court is no longer providing a Reporter! 3 UNIFIED FAMILY court Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) These departments may under! Provisions of CCP 473 ( b ). a reservation Number and information will be provided a. Privacy right at issue against the public and most in-person services are restored by Department as a trustee )... Objections have been waived by their untimely response.: 9:00 AM 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE )... That UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill 2015! 10, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715 729... Cal.App.3D 905, 908. Number and information will be provided and confirmation... Served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and on... On this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Service of Notice gt. 10, 2023 Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 however, and the is!

Brunch Buffet Overland Park, Loverboy Band Member Dies, Major Crimes Andy Flynn Dies, Eso Humanoid Daedra Location, Articles S